InDi, Lee Hood’s Vision for Spotting Cancer in Blood, Snags $10M

Biotech pioneer Leroy Hood has spent years outlining a vision of finding networks of proteins in the blood that can offer an early warning sign of cancer on the move. Now the startup that Hood and Caltech’s Jim Heath founded to pursue that idea, Seattle-based Integrated Diagnostics, has raised another $10 million to turn it into a commercial reality in the next year.

Integrated Diagnostics, or just InDi for short, is announcing today it has pulled in the third and final $10 million segment of its $30 million Series A venture financing from October 2009. InterWest Partners, The Wellcome Trust, and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg all contributed to this next phase of development. The company, after filling out its executive team with a new chief financial officer and chief business officer, is plowing ahead with a plan to roll out its first commercial product within the next 13 months, says CEO Al Luderer.

If InDi can hit that next goal, and persuade insurers to start paying for this new kind of diagnostic test, then it will be in position to attempt an IPO shortly thereafter, Luderer says.

“This is the realization of Lee Hood’s vision,” Luderer says. “We’re in great shape for the year ahead.”

Al Luderer, CEO of Integrated Diagnostics

The vision at InDi is to create a new class of diagnostic tests that can spot specific proteins that can be shown to be early warning signs of disease. Hood has said he hopes this could shake up the healthcare system by making it possible for doctors to detect diseases much earlier than they can be caught today, giving physicians more information before they make hard decisions about treatment.

InDi has pursued this opportunity in lung cancer first. This is the leading cause of cancer death in the U.S., and a tough malignancy to diagnose and treat in the early stages. An estimated 3.3 million people each year end up having a single nodule in the lungs show up on a chest X-ray or CT scan, which raises the question about whether it’s cancer. About 2 million of those scans come from high-risk populations like smokers or the elderly, while the rest come from incidental findings, Luderer says. If the lesion is large, doctors go ahead and perform a biopsy to analyze the tissue for malignancy.

But if it’s small—generally two centimeters or less in diameter—the lesion presents a conundrum, Luderer says. Chances are it is benign, and not really worth the invasiveness of a biopsy. So those patients tend to go on “watchful waiting,” in which doctors will periodically follow up with imaging scans. But sometimes those small nodes can be a warning sign of a malignancy in its early days. Pulmonologists, Luderer says, “are scared they’ll miss the call.”

The idea at InDi is to provide new information to help doctors determine if they’ve made the right call.

InDi is specifically looking to help doctors tell the difference between benign and malignant lesions. InDi’s service takes a blood sample from the patient and runs it through a mass spectrometer from Agilent Technologies that identifies the presence of certain proteins based on their molecular weight. InDi’s scientists, using some heavy-duty math, narrowed down a list of 50,000 human proteins to a group of about 200 that could consistently be found in blood, and might offer a clue toward malignancy, Luderer says.

The company hasn’t yet published any of its findings in peer-reviewed scientific literature, or identified those proteins, Luderer says. But InDi put its technology to the test last year in a study of samples from 240 patients at three medical centers. Researchers had detailed medical histories on these patients, which included things like CT scan results, biopsy findings, and how sick the patients got over time. The InDi test was able to tell the difference between benign lesions, and malignant ones, when researchers performed the blood-protein analysis and then looked at what the pathology tests said.

InDi is currently running a similar study, this time with samples from 600 patients, that the company hopes will confirm that earlier result, Luderer says. The company will look to publish after the results from its second study come in, he says, which should happen by late this summer.

Taken together, those two studies should help form the basis for a panel of 10-15 “sentinel proteins” that will be the key to diagnosing benign or malignant lung tumors, Luderer says. Once that data is hand, InDi will be in position to start marketing its test to pulmonologists. The company plans to establish a centralized lab, in which pulmonologists will send patients’ blood samples in for analysis, and InDi will send them back a report on the patients’ risk. This type of operation, known as a CLIA lab, doesn’t require FDA approval.

InDi currently has about 30 employees, and plans to hire another 10 or so this year as it scales up for its commercial phase, Luderer says. The new financing will enable the company to complete the next steps in clinical development, but by the second half of the year, it expects to raise more money through a Series B financing to help it go commercial.

Because InDi’s test is based on complex new protein analysis, the company plans to build its own specially trained sales force of about 35-50 sales reps, who will make their pitch to about 6,000 pulmonologists in the U.S., Luderer says. He didn’t say what he expects the test to cost, but it will be in the same range as high-priced molecular diagnostic offerings from companies like Genomic Health, XDx, and Agendia.

InDi has put together a seasoned executive team to carry out this vision. Ken Fang, the chief medical officer, previously worked at XDx; Guy Seaton, the finance chief, worked at Corus Pharma and SonoSite; and Jim Garner, the chief business officer, has experience as a senior vice president at UnitedHealth, the leading private health insurer.

No other company is believed to be a competitive threat in analyzing blood proteins for lung cancer diagnosis, Luderer says. Maynard, MA-based Allegro Diagnostics, however, is using genomic analysis of biopsied tissues to help doctors answer this same question about benign-vs.-malignant lung tissues. Luderer says InDi’s advantage is in that it’s easier to get a blood sample, and his company’s scientists believe they get more information from looking at proteins rather than nucleic acids.

There are plenty of hurdles to clear before something like this can be widely adopted. Researchers may balk at the data, wondering if it is really predictive, or at least withhold judgment until they see long-term follow-up data from patients who enroll in a prospective study. Doctors will want to be sure not to set off a lot of false alarm bells that lead to unnecessary and aggressive interventions. Payers will want to be sure that they are getting their money’s worth by paying a lot up-front for a diagnostic test that should save money down the road by treating cancer before it’s too late. If InDi is successful with this initial rollout in lung cancer, then investors will surely want to see proof that it can reproduce the feat in early detection of other forms of cancer.

Luderer spent some time on an IPO roadshow with his last company before selling it to Life Technologies. Earlier this month, he renewed some of those Wall Street acquaintances during a trip to the Leerink Swann Global Healthcare Conference. He says it’s possible that InDi could have something of interest to investors at conferences like that, just four years after the Series A financing arrived to support a “whiteboard” idea.

“If we hit our objective, by launching the product this time next year, it will be one of the fastest-from-scratch stories in the venture space we’ve seen in some time,” Luderer says.

Trending on Xconomy

By posting a comment, you agree to our terms and conditions.

8 responses to “InDi, Lee Hood’s Vision for Spotting Cancer in Blood, Snags $10M”

  1. R. Jones says:

    What ever happened to Leroy Hoods Homestead? Why didn’t Homestead graduate and why will InDi be successful?

    According the the Accelerator 2005 press release on Homestead:

    “Fully understanding complex diseases requires systems approaches that integrate biology, technology, computation and medicine,” stated Leroy Hood, ISB president. “Applying cutting edge ideas and techniques, with tools developed at ISB, we are now able to delineate between varying states of health and disease. Identifying genes and proteins that mark the earliest stages of disease sets the stage for developing advanced diagnostics that will enable intervention early in the disease process.”

    In 2009 Xconomy wrote about InDi and the relationship to Homestead. The article mentioned that Homestead did not “graduate” from Accelerator with further venture rounds. Then Carl Weisman was quoted, “Integrative Diagnostics, or InDi, is partially based upon technology that was developed at Homestead Clinical Corp. while within Accelerator, or was the subject of an option agreement between Homestead and Caltech. So this is our fourth graduate.”

    When at first you don’t succeed, redefine success. Both companies hire Mass Spec operators and tell them to find specific proteins. Homestead only hired one and he was part time. InDi has 30 employees but we don’t know what area they work in. Business development? Without any publications or details this looks like Homestead with more money. Money Accelerator chose not to give them.