Seattle Docs, Via Qliance, Aim to Revolutionize Health Care By Freezing Out Insurance

One of the simplest—and most disruptive—business ideas I’ve heard for U.S. health care reform is gaining momentum in downtown Seattle. It’s with a small group of primary care doctors at a company called Qliance, who don’t accept health insurance payments of any kind.

I made a beeline over to the Qliance office after hearing about this in a story Greg wrote a few weeks ago about Nick Hanauer, one of the early investors in Amazon. Hanauer, an investor in Qliance, said health insurance companies despise this idea, and he loves it. So naturally, I had to learn more about what this startup is trying to accomplish from its CEO, Norman Wu.

Here’s the problem they are trying to solve: American insurance companies gobble up about 40 cents of every dollar spent on health care for all the red-tape claims processing that goes on, and for their profits, Wu says. If primary care doctors decide to play ball in this system, the numbers tell an ugly story. They generally need to have a roster of patients 2,500 to 3,500 deep, whip through 25 to 30 appointments with patients each day, allocate less than 15 minutes for each patient, refer them unnecessarily to specialists, and move so fast they can barely remember anyone’s name.

Too much time, and staff energy, is wasted on haggling with insurance companies, and too little time doctoring properly, Wu says. About 90 percent of medical issues can be handled simply by a primary care doc, but these insurance hassles have turned this into a dying form of medicine.

“It’s akin to using your car insurance to pay for a new battery or a set of tires,” Wu says. “It doesn’t make sense.”

Instead, Qliance has set up what it calls “direct practice” which essentially freezes out the health insurers and deals directly with the patients. The patient hands over a credit card to get a recurring monthly membership fee sent to Qliance, for $39 to $79 a month. In return, the patient gets unrestricted use of the primary care service like a customer would get at a health club. If the patient has a fever and cough to get checked out, he or she simply calls to make an appointment, and gets in to see the doctor the same day, for 30 to 60 minutes. The doctor isn’t in such a hurry. He or she only has a roster of 800 patients, and generally books 10 to 12 appointments a day, while also being available for e-mail and phone consultations. The place has unrestricted, 7-day a week access to its physicians.

One thing most people don’t realize is how radically this changes the doctors’ perspective on medicine. The current insurance-based system encourages doctors to run all kinds of procedures and prescribe all kinds of drugs, because that’s how they get paid by insurers. When they get paid directly by the patient, regardless of what they do, the doctors’ perspective on what needs to be done suddenly changes, Wu says.

“They have to order up some procedure so they can justify having spent some time with you,” Wu says of the existing insurance-driven model. “They do unnecessary procedures, order up unnecessary repeat visits, or refer you to specialists. The cost just goes up and up, and the quality goes down.” He adds, “We don’t want to provide an incentive to push things on patients they don’t need. Our customer is the patient, not the insurance company.”

This being health care delivery, there are a lot of complex moving parts. Quite a few tests and procedures, like X-rays, EKG’s, or stitches are included in the Qliance monthly membership, but if a more complex treatment is needed, it can be added as an extra cost. If the patient needs a prescription, … Next Page »

Single PageCurrently on Page: 1 2

Trending on Xconomy

By posting a comment, you agree to our terms and conditions.

6 responses to “Seattle Docs, Via Qliance, Aim to Revolutionize Health Care By Freezing Out Insurance”

  1. ensemble says:

    Great article Luke. You have touched on a very sensitive, and what will become in the coming years, a very contentious and debated topic… The Top-down or bottom-up delivery of healthcare services. It’s a classic “which one of these” situations… like the famous line spoken by Jack Nicholson in the 1985 Movie Prizzi’s Honor when as Charley Partanna the mafia hit-man who has fallen in love with his female hit-person counterpart Irene Walker (played by Kathleen Turner) when he finds out he has to kill her for a hit says begrudgingly, “Do I ‘Ice Her’ or ‘Marry Her’… Which One of These ?” Great line.

    In my opinion, this is where the real Health 3.0 service innovations are going to occur and where the separate technology and services battlegrounds of Web 3.0, Social Networks 3.0, and Mobile 3.0 are going to converge. It’s the “perfect storm” playing field of technologies, politics, and economics rolling out in front of us.

    This market development has been around now for the last 4-5 years and is also know as “Concierge Care” or “Concierge Medicine” or “Retainer Medicine” or “Boutique Medicine”. Some even call them “Executive Health Programs” or “Platinum Practices”. What ever label you call it the end result is that it’s going to be a major topic this next year as the entire Healthcare services marketplace is undergoing a radical upheaval and shakeout as both top-down and bottom-up models for providing and paying for healthcare services is going to be tested marketed and promoted.

    In the past these services have always been linked to “preferential patients” who have the ability to pay, (like what MD-VIP has been doing for years):

    However, through the innovation of internet social networking and client management, crowd sourcing, and the power of membership models, companies like Qliance will have the ability to bring this high-end model to the middle class, and there will be more to come.

    In today’s world where physicians’ incomes are being squeezed from many angles (lower reimbursements from insurance payors, higher operating costs – like malpractice premiums, greater administrative costs, delayed payments and claims processing hassles, etc.), many physicians are looking for ways to improve their income levels and reduce their workloads.

    As a result, many physicians have been compelled to try and put in more hours to see more patients in an attempt to stabilize their practice’s economics. Unfortunately, many find there is just not enough hours in a day to do this and the sad fact is their economic condition continues to worsen.

    Now, a growing number of physicians have responded in a different way. In what many would consider to be a drastic move, a pioneering group of physicians have decided to drop out of all third party payor programs (including Medicare and private insurers). Instead, these practitioners are now offering a limited number of patients the opportunity to pay a fixed annual fee in exchange for “healthcare services and amenities.” with the promise of immediate scheduling and more detailed care.

    This movement is flying directly in the face of the top-down government-led and controlled centralized healthcare model that Washington is trying to create, but will in fact create a larger base of potential business and innovation at the local level because there is going to be an entire healthcare IT services “eco-system” that is going to be developed to support this new grassroots models and relationship between Patients, Physician’s and their Pharmacists because they are going to distance themselves from Payors, Providers, and Pharmaceutical Companies. This is going to help widen the economic reality “gap” between the two sides of this six-sided healthcare rubic cube. Patients in collaboration with their Physicians and Pharmacists that will move away from institutionalized healthcare providers, (with large budgets and overhead), insurance providers (with their high-cost and compliance requirements), and pharmaceutical companies (who keep pushing “designer drugs” and their high costs) on a growing suspicious consumer.

    As an entrepreneur developing a new mobile social networking and digital data acquisition and control solution for managing disease populations, (through my company HubNetworks Solutions) I welcome the developments of this grass roots care model and look forward to working with companies like Qliance in the future.

  2. ensemble says:

    As a follow-up to my previous post above… below are some URL resources for both pro and con viewpoints and perspectives on Concierge Care:

    This is a somewhat dated article (2005) that lays out the playing field for a layman, but has a somewhat negative recommendation for the US market that is somewhat outdated (from The JAOA • Vol 105 • No 11 • November 2005 • 515-520)

    A perspective from a physician who “had reached the end of his own rope…” from a Houston Press Article from 2007 about Dr. Shannon Ray Schrader who was a noted AIDS doctor that had to cut back his practice and his patients, (using a MD-VIP Model)

    Another Physician perspective from a March 2008 Wall Street Journal article by By Dr. Benjamin Brewer, M.D. who details the “hard facts” about how 47 million medically uninsured Americans are going to obtain care from a Primary Care supply side industry that needs to add 140,000 more physicians…

    And an interesting third party viewpoint from a first year law student at Harvard on a blog where he attempted to “de-construct” the concierge care marketplace for better understanding by the Reader. Read through the full blog post and be sure to read the comment by Dr. Steven D. Knope, M.D. who started one of the first Concierge Care clinics 8 years ago and recently wrote a book on the topic.

    M. Schmidt
    Ensemble Ventures, LLC

  3. Saumitra says:

    Best article on healthcare ever – am sure Insurance companies will try hard to kill this model. Just like Gas companies killed electric car , GM killed Pacific rail road… Hope Qliance survives.

  4. I am a Primary Care Doctor and a concierge physician in New York – Dr. Marina Gafanovich MD, 1550 York Ave New York NY 10028, (212) 249-6218. Despite common belief, the insurance companies do not strictly oppose the rise of the concierge aka “boutique” aka “retainer” practices. First of all, the market share is very insignificant. Next, the market itself is a little different. The vast majority of Americans will always prefer to be insured, period. Then, most concierge physician accept the cash patients on top of their regular patient base who are swiping the insurance cards. Finally, even the concierge patients (other than the ones who desire and pay for a true white-glove service) pay cash premium for value-added service and not for the servcies rendered.

    I don’t predict the end of insurance companies any time soon.