Silicon Valley Debates the Do’s and Don’ts of Equity Crowdfunding

Your Facebook friends would love an “Attaboy” from you when they post about their new jobs, or an “Awwww” when they share a puppy picture.

But what will you do when they offer you shares in their startup company?

That expansion of social media is on its way, as soon as securities regulators finish the rules for a new way to float private stock issues—equity crowdfunding.

Congress, by passing the JOBS (Jumpstart Our Business Startups) Act in March, created a number of alternatives to the traditional IPO, or initial public offering, for company financing. One of them will allow entrepreneurs to raise up to a million dollars a year by selling shares in their startups to hundreds or thousands of people they’ll reach through websites and social media networks.

Crowdfunding may be familiar to you in the form of existing websites like Kickstarter and Indiegogo, the online forums where artists or inventors can appeal for financial support from people who like their ideas. In return for their dough, contributors might get a reward like an early copy of a band’s CD, a thank you card or T-shirt.

The success of these platforms—where some fledgling projects have raised more than $1 million—has inspired the next step: selling equity stakes in young companies. Indiegogo CEO Slava Rubin, who wants his San Francisco-based site to become an equity crowdfunding portal, predicts that the Securities and Exchange Commission will clear the path for the new financing route by issuing regulations in the first quarter of 2013.

Larry Kane, a Silicon Valley attorney who works with emerging companies, says the method could help small outfits that haven’t been able to raise capital from the usual sources: friends and family of company founders, angel investors, and venture capital firms.

“Clients and potential clients are routinely asking about crowdfunding, ‘When can I do it?,”’ says Kane, a partner at San Francisco-based Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe. He says the method will probably attract entrepreneurs such as consumer-product makers and developers of smartphone apps or edutech projects.

But should they do it? Is it a good idea to post your novel business plan on a public website? What are the risks of taking on thousands of private shareholders?

Kane will lead a panel discussion of these topics at Orrick’s Menlo Park office on Thursday. The event will include representatives of two trade groups, the Crowdfunding Professional Association and the National Crowdfunding Association, that have been weighing in with Congress and the SEC over the language of the JOBS Act and upcoming SEC regulations.

The task for the SEC is to protect investors who buy shares through crowdfunding sites, while supporting the aims of the JOBS Act—to make capital available to small businesses so they can grow and hire employees. Opponents of equity crowdfunding, including some state securities regulators, fear that the financing mechanism will expose thousands of unsophisticated investors to fraudulent stock offerings.

Sherwood Neiss, a co-founder of the Crowdfunding Professional Association, says the concerns of consumer groups and other opponents come from a “very valid place.”

“They’ve experienced the fraud that can take place under the current system,” such as the Bernie Madoff scandal where many investors lost their shirts, Neiss says.

Neiss says the nature of social media itself may mitigate some of the worst hazards. Crowdfunding companies will offer their shares through “pitch pages” on crowdfunding portals, where critics can poke holes in their business plans and ask pointed questions, he says. So far, the SEC has released … Next Page »

Single PageCurrently on Page: 1 2

Trending on Xconomy

By posting a comment, you agree to our terms and conditions.

2 responses to “Silicon Valley Debates the Do’s and Don’ts of Equity Crowdfunding”

  1. It will take time for procedures to develop, but crowdfunding is better than the alternative of waiting on some bank or VC firm to fund your vision. The article is another indication of the disruptive nature of crowdfunding. I write about this in my new book on Crowdfunding. See:

  2. Chuck Scifers says:

    Having experience with funding from VC’s I see Crowdfunding as a welcome relief from those exploiters. I hope that they are squirming in their seats, thinking that they may have to play more fair with their clients…and compete with this disrupting new funding vehicle. Power to the People!

    Chuck Scifers
    [email protected]