San Diego Faces Its Future as a Tech Hub Without Qualcomm as Anchor

(Page 2 of 2)

a recent interview that he sees no compelling reason for shareholders not to sell. Insiders control less than 1 percent of Qualcomm shares, while institutional shareholders control more than 76 percent, according to investment research firm Morningstar.

In the meantime, local civic leaders are doing what they can to call attention to the situation.

The EDC, working with the San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce and San Diego Mayor Kevin Falconer, has kicked off a social media campaign to support Qualcomm that uses the hashtag #QualCOMMUNITY. Among other things, they are trying to highlight Qualcomm’s importance to the region, saying it is the largest public company in the region—with a market valuation of roughly $100 billion—and the largest private sector employer, with more than 13,000 employees in San Diego. In a recent assessment of Qualcomm’s role as an economic engine, the EDC estimates that Qualcomm’s economic impact here amounted to $4.9 billion in 2017—the equivalent of 35 Comic-Cons.

Fretful observers also may be heartened by the fact that the outcome of Broadcom’s proposed buyout is anything but a done deal.

Aside from numerous regulatory hurdles, Reuters reported recently the deal has come under additional scrutiny by an inter-agency national security panel that reviews transactions that might lead to foreign ownership of American defense contractors and other companies with technology deemed critical to national security.

While Broadcom’s CEO has vowed to move his corporate headquarters from Singapore to Delaware before the deal closes, that may not be enough to satisfy the panel, known officially as the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). As Reuters noted, the panel’s interest also is motivated at least in part by the fact that Broadcom is mounting what is essentially a hostile takeover by putting forward a slate of six Broadcom nominees for Qualcomm’s 11-member board.

[Editor’s note: In a rare intervention, CFIUS ordered Qualcomm to postpone its March 6 shareholder vote by 30 days to give the panel time to fully investigate the national security implications of the proposed deal. According to The New York Times, the committee typically works behind closed doors and reviews deals only after they are announced. In a statement Monday,  Qualcomm said it would adjourn its shareholder meeting without taking a vote and reconvene its shareholders meeting on April 5 at 8 a.m. at Qualcomm’s San Diego headquarters.]

Qualcomm and its board also have worked assiduously to pick apart Broadcom’s offer, even after Broadcom boosted its offer to $82 a share in early February. The board voted unanimously a few days later to reject the revised offer, saying the proposal “materially undervalues” Qualcomm, and that Broadcom’s proposal fell short in the details in terms of resolving likely regulatory commitments such a deal requires.

In short, significant uncertainty surrounds the deal.

While Connect’s McKee said a successful buyout would be a huge negative in the short run if Broadcom succeeds, he said, “In the long run I have a totally different view, in that you have all these incredibly talented people at Qualcomm who will hopefully stay here, and maybe start new things.”

Losing Qualcomm would likely be similar to the loss of General Dynamics’ San Diego plants in the early 1990s, according to Mary Walshok, an associate vice chancellor at UC San Diego and a sociologist who studies the innovation economy. “Even if the worst case happens, San Diego has a history of pivoting as large centers of gravity caved in,” Walshok said.

At San Diego’s EvoNexus startup incubator, which is working to close a funding gap that would likely open if the nonprofit loses Qualcomm’s corporate support, CEO Rory Moore compares Qualcomm to a big “anchor tenant” in a shopping mall.

“When a company starts downsizing, talent starts looking elsewhere [for jobs],” Moore said. “Not everybody wants to be an entrepreneur, and they leave town.”

From a regional perspective, Moore said if there’s no anchor tech company in San Diego, it’s going to be difficult to get talented engineers and executives to move here. “The thing that would trouble me the most if I were mayor of San Diego is that when the talent starts to leak out, it hurts everything,” Moore said.

Single PageCurrently on Page: 1 2 previous page

Bruce V. Bigelow was the editor of Xconomy San Diego from 2008 to 2018. Read more about his life and work here. Follow @bvbigelow

Trending on Xconomy