Palforzia Peanut Allergy Immunotherapy: Aimmune CEO on REMS, Manufacturing

Xconomy National — 

Aimmune Therapeutics Inc. is navigating a host of new challenges as it launches Palforzia, the first peanut allergy immunotherapy to be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Most notably, it must get physician practices and individual allergists certified to administer the treatment.

Aimmune (NASDAQ: AIMT) president and CEO Jayson Dallas talked to our sister publication the Pink Sheet about the certification process, part of the company’s Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS), in an interview in New York last month. He also discussed the complexities involved in manufacturing the food-derived treatment.

Some analysts have speculated that the restriction on administration might slow the uptake of Palforzia and limit its use, but Dallas does not see it as a significant hurdle. He said clinics must go online and certify via a box check-off that they have the experience and staff to do immunotherapy and have access to the emergency allergic reaction treatment EpiPen (epinephrine injection) at all times. The certification process is similar for physicians, who are not required to go through training.

The US Food and Drug Administration approved Palforzia [peanut, (Arachis hypogaea) Allergan Powder-dnfp] on 31 January to mitigate allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, that may occur with accidental exposure to peanut in patients ages four to 17 years.

Palforzia was associated with a higher rate of systemic allergic reactions and epinephrine use in clinical trials, and to mitigate this risk the agency required Aimmune to implement a REMS.


Members of FDA’s advisory committee had requested that additional measures be included in the REMS beyond those suggested by the agency, including informed consent and documentation that patients and their families understand they are to continue to avoid eating peanut-containing products.

The final REMS incorporates the panel’s recommendations. Patients must certify that they understand how Palforzia works and will always carry an EpiPen and return to the practice to get new EpiPen prescriptions when they run out or expire.

“They have to understand that for the first couple months they may have allergic reactions to treatment that will go away over time as efficacy gets better,” he said. “This is where setting expectations up front is critical.”

Patients check-off the certification form online in the physician’s office. The patient data goes to a third-party REMS administrator, which submits a report to FDA every six months. Dallas said it is almost exactly the kind of consent that allergy practices require from children undergoing immunotherapy for grass and pollen allergies.

Once the patient is cleared to receive the product, the powder in the capsules, which consists of peanut flour, is emptied onto semisolid food, such as applesauce, yogurt or pudding. Patients are given increasing doses in three sequential phases to desensitize them. They receive the initial single day dose escalation in the doctor’s office and then receive a 14-day supply from one of three specialty pharmacies that are certified to distribute it, AllianceRx Walgreens, CVS Specialty, and Optum Specialty Pharmacy. They return to the doctor’s office in two weeks to receive the second dose and then are put on a maintenance dose of 300 mg daily.

Aimmune’s 80-person field team began meeting with allergists on 4 February to encourage them to incorporate Palforzia into their practice. And the company announced on 16 March that the first patients in the US are being treated with Palforzia.

The company launched a REMS website which lists the prescribers and healthcare settings that are certified to administer Palforzia capsules.


The nature of the product also involves novel manufacturing considerations. Dallas said that he had received a lot of questions about how the company was faring with the chemistry, manufacturing and control (CMC) processes, as they pose hurdles for many biotech companies in the final stages of FDA review.

Dallas said most manufacturing challenges arise during the production of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), which has to be made at the same quality and scaled up for commercial marketing.

“Our process in a way is fortunate because our API is roasted, defatted ground peanut flour. So we don’t have a whole lot of complexity and challenge on the API production side or on the ability to scale up or scale down API supplies,” Dallas said.

He noted that the biggest challenge is getting the API accepted as a good manufacturing process drug substance. “We have to do the allergen expression analytic and measure so that every piece of every batch has exactly the right allergenic expression on it,” he said. “That analytic that turns it into drug substance is the most complicated part of the process.”

The product then goes through a sterile manufacturing process and a comprehensive individual dose measuring process at Aimmune’s plant. The entire process is based in the US. The peanuts are grown in Georgia, the manufacturing is done in Clearwater, FL, and the packaging is done in Illinois.

“It has not been without complexity but we have not run into any issues,” Dallas said. “We had an FDA inspection and did very well.”

During a 16 March call with analysts, Dallas acknowledged the impact that the coronavirus will likely have on the launch of Palforzia, but he said manufacturing operations remain fully operational and the company has sufficient Palforzia finished product on hand to meet demand for the foreseeable future and expects to remain in a position to continue to produce new product as necessary.

“We don’t have an end date here, but we are able to meet demand for quite some time,” he stated.


DBV Technologies (NASDAQ: DBVT), which is looking to be the second entry into the peanut allergy treatment space, is facing another delay with review of its Viaskin Peanut patch. On 16 March, DBV announced that FDA had informed the company that during its ongoing review of the BLA it “identified questions regarding efficacy, including the impact of patch-site-adhesion.”

Therefore, the Allergenic Products Advisory Committee that had been slated for 15 May will not take place as scheduled.

DBV said it may submit additional information on patch-site adhesion from its clinical program as well as long-term efficacy results from the three-year open-label extension study, PEOPLE, to answer FDA’s questions. DBV said to its knowledge the target action date of 5 August remains unchanged, but noted that if it submits additional information to FDA, that may constitute a major amendment to the BLA and could extend the target action date.

It’s the second significant review setback for Viaskin Peanut. The company withdrew its BLA in December 2018 after FDA requested additional data on manufacturing procedures and quality controls. The application was resubmitted on 6 August and DBV announced in October that FDA had accepted the BLA with a user fee action date of 5 August.

Dallas expressed skepticism that … Next Page »

Single PageCurrently on Page: 1 2

Brenda Sandburg is a senior writer who covers legal issues and FDA regulatory policy, with a particular focus on patents, biosimilars, and government investigations. She can be reached at [email protected] Follow @brendasandburg

Trending on Xconomy