all the information, none of the junk | biotech • healthcare • life sciences

What We Learned in San Diego About Innovation: Five Lessons for Detroit


Xconomy Detroit/Ann Arbor — 

The defense and aerospace industries dominated San Diego’s economy for decades after World War II. General Dynamics was the region’s largest private employer, accounting for about 15 percent of the county’s workforce (with about 46,000 employees) in the early 1960s; its workers built commercial aircraft, Atlas rockets, and cruise missiles.

When General Dynamics began pulling up its stakes almost 25 years ago, the San Diego economy went into a tailspin, and local leaders focused on finding ways to diversify. Many smaller defense contractors shifted from manufacturing to the defense technologies that remained in high demand—especially military IT (which includes communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance). Some pursued similar opportunities in the commercial sector for wireless communications, IT, sensors, and systems integration. A small consulting company Linkabit, started by two UC San Diego professors, paved the way for San Diego to become the wireless center of the world. Similarly the founding of a successful biotech startup called Hybritech by UC San Diego professors became a paradigm in our efforts to broaden and diversify San Diego’s life sciences industry.

So what have we learned?

—Analyze what you do best and do that. During the recession that hit 25 years ago, San Diego decided to focus on commercializing discoveries from our local academic and research institutions. Local research institutes have expanded from 10 back then to 50 today. Michigan has great research institutions as well, so focus on them for inspired innovation.

—Don’t minimize the importance of small companies. You have to start somewhere. San Diego isn’t particularly well-known for its large corporations, but we are really good at starting hundreds of small high-tech, high-wage companies. Last year was not a great year for job creation anywhere, yet San Diego added 1,100 new technology-related jobs. And the salaries in those jobs are nearly twice the average wages in the area. I recommend a recent column on “Just Doing It” by Thomas Friedman in the New York Times.

—Cultivate technology clusters. In 2004, the Milken Institute published a report that ranked San Diego as the nation’s No. 1 biotech cluster. The report says “Clusters of existing and … Next Page »

Single PageCurrently on Page: 1 2

Duane J. Roth was Chief Executive Officer and board member of CONNECT, the San Diego nonprofit organization that fosters entrepreneurship by catalyzing, accelerating, and supporting technology and life sciences innovation. He founded Alliance Pharmaceutical, and was a longtime life sciences industry executive. Follow @

Trending on Xconomy

By posting a comment, you agree to our terms and conditions.

2 responses to “What We Learned in San Diego About Innovation: Five Lessons for Detroit”

  1. JB says:

    “San Diego added 1,100 new technology-related jobs. And the salaries in those jobs are nearly twice the average wages in the area. I recommend a recent column on “Just Doing It” by Thomas Friedman in the New York Times.”

    An item to note; San Diego is extremely cost prohibitive for an average family. The higher wages in San Diego may actually still provide a lower standard of living than an average salary in Detriot.

    I’d be careful of copying anything in CA, anything, if I were a government official. Texas is a better study, imho, Austin in particular.

  2. jwilly48519 says:

    Statistically, “high tech” companies are most frequently started by professors, grad students and recent advanced-degree graduates in engineering, the sciences and management…and most frequently in the “light” sciences, i.e. EE, bio, information tech, where commercialization of ideas is relatively less capital intensive.

    Michigan has relatively few of these kinds of individuals, especially in the ex-industrial cities. Michigan’s universities and intellectual talent pool overall tend to be more focused on mechanical engineering and on turning out individuals with BS degrees, who go on to be someone else’s employee. Nothing wrong with that, but it doesn’t get new high tech businesses started.

    Offering such entrepreneurs what the ex-industrial cities have in abundance… empty buildings; lots of underutilized, previous-generation support infrastructure; available talent for mechanical-product manufacturing… is ineffective.

    The most important factor in location-selection for high-tech entrepreneurs is where they want to live. They typically want excellent schools, low crime, a generally intelligence-valuing society, social life populated mostly by professionals like themselves. The ex-industrial cities have trouble competing on that basis.

    All of the above are readily discerned by study of the high tech nexuses since WWII, starting with the 128/495 belt around Boston/Cambridge.

    The only historically proven way to attract high tech entrepreneurs to a locale that doesn’t meet the above criteria is by throwing money at them…selectively, one hopes. But, that has obvious problems.