Massachusetts has a long, honorable history of proactively investing in its own long-term economic success. A great example occurred 150 years ago this month, when the Massachusetts legislature funded the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), creating one of the nation’s first land grant colleges.
In 1861, Governor John Andrews and the legislature likely did not think of their actions in modern terms like public-private partnerships, technology clusters, or enhanced infrastructure, but that is essentially what it was. They understood that through state support of education, science, and technology the state and its citizens could prosper in the long run.
As a world-leading research university and the incubator of numerous high-tech industries in the state, across America and around the globe, MIT has proved its worth and the foresight of the state’s investment. Similarly, today’s efforts to encourage and build a strong biotechnology and biopharmaceutical research sector in Massachusetts are as ambitious and visionary.
Governors and legislators of both political parties have, for years, demonstrated both pragmatic consensus and real vision by supporting public and private efforts to create in the state one of the leading biotechnology research and manufacturing infrastructures found anywhere in the world.
The present day benefits of these efforts are enormous.
First and foremost, of course, there are patients everywhere who directly benefit from the research initiated and conducted in the state. From cancer to diabetes to HIV/AIDS and a host of rare diseases, Massachusetts-based researchers are working on solving some of the most difficult healthcare challenges we face. The answers they seek—whether resulting in small, steady incremental improvement of treatments or in some major therapeutic breakthrough—are giving patients new hope for better health and a longer life. These researchers and laboratories are also laying the scientific and technical foundation for the next great era of medicine: genetic and an even more targeted and personalized healthcare.
However, policy makers can also take pride in the simple pragmatism of their efforts. By investing in a strong, innovative Massachusetts-based … Next Page »
By posting a comment, you agree to our terms and conditions.