What Google’s $700M Acquisition of ITA Means to Boston, and to Competition with Expedia, Bing, and Kayak

(Page 2 of 2)

positive effect on Google’s relationships with MIT grads and other techies, and certainly won’t hurt recruiting. Plus, from what I’m hearing, the culture of ITA and Google should be a good match—they’re both heavily populated by well-meaning engineering geeks. What’s more, this is just a huge win for Boston tech startups.

2. Kayak, Expedia, and Bing Travel will adjust.

Google is entering a hornet’s nest of competition with airlines and travel shopping sites, not to mention starting a side war with Microsoft’s Bing. It’s safe to assume those parties will band together to oppose the deal, and antitrust laws will be an issue—but most people I’ve talked to think regulators will approve the deal. So where does that leave players that use ITA’s system, like Connecticut-based Kayak, and those that don’t, like Bellevue, WA-based Expedia (which also owns TripAdvisor in the Boston area)?

Google has said it will honor ITA’s existing contracts, but those are for a set amount of time. Within a year or two, look for Kayak and Bing to get the flight data they need from other sources like Worldspan, Sabre, or even directly from airlines. Nevertheless, the deal is a pretty serious challenge to Kayak, which may need to lean more heavily on other aspects of its business, like hotels, cruises, and rentals. Those are areas that Google may take longer to get into because of all the relationships required (ITA doesn’t have them)—but that’s probably coming, because of the huge market for leisure travel. Similarly, Expedia can’t be too excited to be competing with Google now, but the Seattle-area firm has plenty of options and resources—did I mention TripAdvisor, which by all accounts has been printing money for the better part of a decade?

3. Look for more travel startups, not more consolidation.

Some observers have speculated that the Google-ITA deal will trigger other mergers, between companies like Expedia and Kayak, for example. But most sources I’ve talked to don’t see it that way. Kayak, they say, needs to prove its value (beyond its technology) anew. Other travel and search technology startups like Everbread and Imagini, both based in the U.K., are probably too young to get acquired yet. At least one travel analyst, Henry Harteveldt of Forrester Research, emphasizes that the Google deal gives startups and their investors “a lot of confidence,” and validates the need for new technology in the sector. “It shows that travel is a complex beast, it has not been solved, and there is opportunity,” he says.

Single PageCurrently on Page: 1 2 previous page

Gregory T. Huang is Xconomy's Editor in Chief. E-mail him at gthuang [at] xconomy.com. Follow @gthuang

Trending on Xconomy

By posting a comment, you agree to our terms and conditions.

5 responses to “What Google’s $700M Acquisition of ITA Means to Boston, and to Competition with Expedia, Bing, and Kayak”

  1. Bob the Chef says:

    “well-meaning geeks”? That’s the stupidest phrase I’ve heard in my life. What does that even mean?

  2. Bob the Chef, you sound a bit like Bill Gates, and for that I commend you. It means people who want to solve tough technical problems, and who might take “Don’t Be Evil” as their motto.

  3. Zan says:

    Why did ITA cost $700 million whereas Farecast cost just $20 million? For what each company offers looks like Microsoft got a much better deal.

  4. Zan, Microsoft bought Farecast for $115 million. But still much cheaper than ITA. I think the offerings are fundamentally pretty different.